Legal Opinion

Blizzard v. Hastings

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 31, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-212-RRM, 92-475-RRMPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKELVIE, District Judge.

These are two civil rights cases. The plaintiff, Gary E. Blizzard, is a state prisoner incarcerated at the Sussex Correctional Institution. The defendants in Civil Action No. 92-475, George Truitt and Earl Messick, and the defendant in Civil Action No. 94-212, Sam Hastings, are employees of the Department of Corrections of the State of Delaware.

In his amended complaints Blizzard alleges the defendants have wrongfully retaliated against him for exercising his first amendment rights, wrongfully denied him due process during disciplinary proceedings, and conspired…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hoover v. WatsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995
  2. Watson v. McGinnisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  3. Abdul-Akbar v. Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995
  4. Robinson v. DanbergDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  5. Carrigan v. State of Del.District Court, D. Delaware · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API