Legal Opinion

Abdul-Akbar v. Department of Corrections

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 19, 1995No. 95-801-RRMPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Debro Siddiq Abdul-Akbar, pro se.

McKELVIE, District Judge.

This is a civil rights case. Plaintiff is incarcerated at Sussex Correctional Institution (“SCI”) located in Georgetown, Delaware. Defendants are various prison officials within the Delaware Department of Corrections (“DOC”). Plaintiff has filed multiple complaints under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Each is accompanied by a petition for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

In plaintiffs complaints, he alleges that defendants have violated his rights under the First, Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Debro S. Abdul-Akbar v. Roderick R. MckelvieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. Yount v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. McFadden v. LehmanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Abraham v. DANBERGDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API