Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Redman v. $122.44
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 2, 2010No. 106292PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REIF, J.;
{1 The issue presented on certiorari review is whether the trial court and the Court of Civil Appeals correctly forfeited weapons that were kept in the same residence where marijuana was found that, in turn, led to a conviction of the owner for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. Upon certiorari review, we hold that the trial court and the Court of Civil Appeals erred in the forfeiture of the weapons in question and reverse.
12 Following the service of a search warrant at his home, Joe Harrell, Jr., was convicted of possessing some 22 ounces of packaged marijuana with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. One Parcel of Real Estate Commonly Known as 916 Douglas Avenue, Elgin, Illinois, Appeal of Paul F. Born, Iii, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Platt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Katner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Department of Public Safety v. 1985 GMC Pickup, Serial 1GTBS14EOF2525894, OK Tag No. ZPE852Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Pan v. BaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beohm v. Pickel (In re Pickel)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- State Ex Rel. Ladd v. $457.02Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Prater v. 2010 Toyota Corolla, VIN 1NXBU4EE4AZ313776Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- STATE ex rel. PRATER v. 2010 TOYOTA COROLLACourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Redman v. $122.44Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.