Legal Opinion

Steele v. Gray

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1974No. 50, 560, 561PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

At oral argument, the assistant attorney general representing the officers of the department of health & social services conceded that each of the prisoners was entitled to a full due process hearing prior to revocation of good time. He stated that the department now recognizes and follows the mandate of United States ex rel. Miller v. Twomey (7th Cir. 1973), 479 Fed. 2d 701, 718, U. S. Sup. Ct. certiorari denied (1974).

That ease followed the principles of Morrissey v. Brewer (1972), 408 U. S. 471, 481, 92 Sup. Ct. 2593, 33 *428L. Ed. 2d 484. Commenting on Morrissey v. Brewer, the Seventh Circuit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. CadyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. School District No. 3 of Adams v. CallahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Ledgering v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State Ex Rel. Plotkin v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Meeks v. GagnonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  2. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. PedersenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Hauser v. CarballoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Putnam v. McCauleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Tyznik v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API