Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Hauser v. Carballo
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided January 3, 1978No. 77-054, 76-317, 75-870PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbrahamson, J.
These cases have been consolidated for decision because they raise common questions concerning the procedures which must be followed by the Department of Health and Social Services (hereinafter Department) in determining whether to forfeit a parole violator’s good time credits. The specific issues we are called upon to determine are:
1. Does this court’s decision in Putnam v. McCauley, 70 Wis.2d 256, 234 N.W.2d 75 (1975) require that a mandatory release parole violator be given a due process hearing before forfeiture of any of his good time or before forfeiture of only that part of his good…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McCleary v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Metropolis Theatre Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Peterson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Jeffrey E. Felce v. Patrick Fiedler, Earl Brunk, Also Known as Andy Brunk, David H. Dhein, and James L. SchansbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Penjuke v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Grobarchik v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Parker v. SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.