Legal Opinion

Witbeck v. Niagara, Lockport & Ontario Power Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 11, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, J.:

It is alleged in substance in the complaint that the defendants Niagara, Lockport and Ontario Power Company and International Power and Transmission Company propose to abrogate certain contracts for furnishing electric current, in which contracts plaintiffs have an interest, and to substitute therefor another contract in which certain other defendants are interested. This latter contract, it is claimed, is more favorable to the power and lighting corporations but will impose higher rates on plaintiffs. A temporary injunction order restraining these corporations from putting their…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. In re Arkansas Railroad RatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · 1909
  3. Osborn v. Heyer & BurdettNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  4. Lowber v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  5. American Exchange National Bank v. GoubertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cowan v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. Louis J. Sigl, Inc. v. BresnahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. IrvingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Holton v. Board of SupervisorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API