Louis J. Sigl, Inc. v. Bresnahan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSeabs, J.
The defendant has moved to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint on the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in favor of either plaintiff, or in the alternative to require plaintiff to serve an amended complaint separately stating and numbering the causes of action in favor of each plaintiff. The motion has been denied with leave to defendant to serve an answer within twenty days from service of said order upon defendant’s attorney.
The complaint discloses these facts: The corporation plaintiff was the successful bidder for the construction of certain…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burt v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Halberstadt v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Niles v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Paul v. FargoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Cardival v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Loeb v. TeitelbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Liberty Synergistics, Inc. v. Microflo Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of BrownNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
- Airgas-Southwest, Inc. v. IWS Gas & Supply of Texas, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.