Legal Opinion
McDaniel v. Baker Sand & Gravel Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided March 10, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, District Judge.
This was a libel filed on the admiralty side of the court and alleged that libelant’s intestate was drowned ip Mobile river, within the admiralty jurisdiction of the court; that the drowning was caused by the negligence of the employees of the Baker Sand & Gravel Company, while such intestate was employed by the said company on one of its barges; that said company maintains a place of business within Mobile, from which its operations in this port are conducted. In' the body of the libel it claims the benefit of the provisions of the Jones Act (41 Stat. 988).
The Baker…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Louisville, Cincinnati, & Charleston Rail-Road v. LetsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- T. Smith & Son, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Caceres v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1924
- Villard v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. C. D. Mallory & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Brown v. C. D. Mallory & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- Bennett v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1940
- Eckert v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1935
- McKola v. McCormick S. S. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.