Legal Opinion

Capps v. Weflen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 2013No. 20120184PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Colleen Weflen, Marleen Weflen, Sharon Kruse, Catherine Harris, Norris Weflen, Windsor Bakken, LLC, Gulfport Energy Corp. and EOG Resources, Inc., appeal a district court judgment vacating a previous order granting Weflens’ motion for summary judgment, granting Capps’ motion for summary judgment and finding Weflens had no claim to a one-half mineral interest reserved by Ruth Nelson in 1975. We dismiss Weflens’ appeal, concluding the district court abused its discretion in directing entry of a final judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b).

I

[¶ 2] In 1975, Ruth Nelson conveyed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Union State Bank v. WoellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Brummund v. BrummundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Pifer v. McDermottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Pifer v. McDermottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. James Vault & Precast Co. v. B&B Hot Oil Service, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Dixon v. DixonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Greer v. Global Indus., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Capps v. WeflenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Baker v. Autos, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API