Legal Opinion

Hayward v. Samuel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1946No. Appeal, 97PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

This was a taxpayer’s class bill to restrain certain officers of Philadelphia from expending public funds 1 in exterminating pigeons in the section of the city bounded by Girard Avenue, Delaware River, South Street and the Schuylkill River. The bill alleged that the ordinance was “invalid, illegal and unconstitutional.” The Society For The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals was made a party defendant because its lethal chambers were used to destroy the pigeons.

The challenged ordinance was passed on October 17, 1945, and amends section 1 of an ordinance of 1869…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Philadelphia v. ProvidentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  2. Kennedy v. Board of HealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
  3. Paris v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Adams v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. COLTS RUN CIVIC v. Colts Neck Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  2. Guidi v. City of Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  3. Philadelphia v. Watt Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Philadelphia v. Katz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1946
  5. Springdale Borough v. Chinchilla, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API