Legal Opinion

Philadelphia v. Watt Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1947No. Appeal, 153PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,.

Defendants have owned a parcel of land in Philadelphia fronting on Olney Avenue for twenty-eight years. During all of that time a strip sixteen feet wide across the rear of their lot has been a part of a private driveway connecting Fifteenth Street with Chew Street. Under date of March 26, 1943 the Board of Health of the City of Philadelphia gave defendants written notice of a resolution adopted by it to the effect that, because of improper grading and defective paving, the driveway had been “declared to be a nuisance, having a tendency to endanger and be prejudicial to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Lawton v. . SteeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Gundling v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Brereton EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Barnes & Tucker Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Sobocinski v. City of WilliamsportCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. RogersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API