Callaway Golf Co. v. Kappos
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEONIE M. BRINKEMA, District Judge.
Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment [Dkt. Nos. 10 and 22] concerning plaintiff Callaway Golf Company’s (“Callaway”) request to vacate defendant United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (“PTO”) inter partes reexaminations of four of Callaway’s patents. For the reasons stated in this Memorandum Opinion, Callaway’s motion will be denied and defendants’ motion will be granted.
I. Background
A. Statutory and regulatory background
A patent’s validity can be challenged either in a lawsuit filed in federal district…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- South Carolina v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- Versata Development Corp. v. ReaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Automated Merchandising Systems, Inc. v. ReaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014