Gossner v. Utah Power and Light
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HARDING, District Judge:
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order made by the District Court in an action between the parties hereto after a pretrial conference.
The plaintiffs own farm lands along the natural channel of the Bear River in Cache County, Utah, above the reservoir formed by a dam in the river owned by the defendant, Utah Power & Light Company, called the “Cutler Dam.” Subject to certain prior rights, the defendant has the right to divert at the Stewart Dam in Idaho and impound and store in the nearby Bear Lake Reservoir all of the waters of the Bear River to the extent of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gowing v. McCandlessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Kunz v. Utah Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- McDaniel v. Greenville-Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- State v. Bonelli Cattle CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. BONELLI CATTLE COMPANYArizona Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jensen v. Intermountain Power AgencyUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Rocky Mountain Thrift Stores Inc. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1994
- Kunz v. Utah Power & Light Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Kunz v. Utah Power & Light Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Rocky Mountain Thrift Stores Inc. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1994