Legal Opinion

Veal v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1958No. 8868PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLADNEY, Judge.

This action seeks recovery of damages for personal injuries sustained by Henry Veal, an elderly Negro, when struck by an automobile being moved within the garage portion of the premises of Pearce Motor Company by its employee, H. H. Hale. The defendants deny liability, asserting an absence of actionable negligence on the part of Hale, and alternatively pleading as a bar to his right of recovery that Veal was guilty of contributory negligence. The case was tried on the merits and after a consideration of the issues so presented, judgment was rendered rejecting plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Loney v. Laramie Auto Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Mills v. HeidingsfieldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Salter v. ZoderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Corder v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  5. Cotten v. ButlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gasquet v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Spinks v. GENERAL FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, NYLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Hanford v. Jan C. Uiterwyk CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Potter v. Board of Com'rs of Port of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Hazleton v. WatsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API