Legal Opinion
Mills v. Heidingsfield
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 3, 1939No. 6032PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Judge.
The owner of a house in the City of Shreveport, Louisiana, and her insurer are the defendants in this tort action. Plaintiff alleges:
“That on the 10th day of October, 1938, at about 8:30 o’clock P. M., your petitioner lawfully went on said porch of said house for the purpose of inquiring as to a reported future vacancy of the premises and residence, and after finishing conversing with the occupants of the house, petitioner proceeded across the porch to said steps for the purpose of descending the steps to the ground. Upon reaching the edge of said porch near the steps, suddenly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Klein v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Cristadoro v. Von Behren's HeirsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Heath v. Suburban Building & Loan Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
- Vargas v. Blue Seal Bottling Works, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Bell v. Houston & S. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Alexander v. General Accident Fire & L. Assur. Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Mercer v. Tremont G. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
- First National Bank of Birmingham v. LowerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Savoy v. GF Poole MortuaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
- Payton v. St. JohnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.