Urologic Surgeons, Inc. v. Bullock
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.
Appellant, Urologic Surgeons, Inc. (“US”) appeals the summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis in favor of respondent, Dr. Arnold Bullock (“Bullock”). US brought suit against Bullock for promissory estop-pel, breach of contract, fraudulent misrepresentation and negligent misrepresentation. We affirm.
US provides urological services to patients in the St. Louis metropolitan area. In December of 1999, there were three equal shareholders of US: Dr. Bela Denes (“Denes”), Dr. Perry Lovinggood (“Lo-vinggood”) and Dr. Stephen Bigg…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Sofka v. ThalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Thoroughbred Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Morsinkhoff v. De Luxe Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Alonzo v. LaubertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Robert Baum v. Helget Gas Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Cadco, Inc. v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Roth v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Kempton v. DuganMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Consolidated Grain & Barge, Co. v. HobbsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.