Legal Opinion

State v. Shirk

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1920No. 10,505PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Morgan Circuit Court; Nathan A. Whitaker, Judge. Action by the State of New Jersey against Elbert W. Shirk and others in which defendants filed cross-complaints. From a judgment on the cross-complaints for defendants, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Action by appellant against appellees on a judgment against the Midland Portland Cement Company, a New Jersey corporation, for taxes due the State of New Jersey, and to enforce a stockholder’s liability for the payment of such judgment. Appellees Shirk, Benedict and Packard each filed an amended cross-complaint asking that the judgment against the Midland Portland Cement Company as to each of them be declared null and void and for other relief. Fred W. Spacke, now represented by appellee, administrator, also filed an amended cross-complaint of the same character as the others and praying for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Owens v. RansteadIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Great West Min. Co. v. Woodmas of Alston Min. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  3. Frenzel v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Kirkpatrick v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Cotterell v. KoonIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hollinger v. HollingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Papuschak v. BurichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Sicanoff v. MILLERIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Donnelley v. ThorneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Roth v. BonarIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API