Legal Opinion

Rose v. Phinney, 1-06-108 (10-15-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 2007No. 1-06-108PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} The plaintiffs-appellants appeal the judgment of the Allen County Common Pleas Court granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee, Hastings Mutual Insurance Company.

PARTIES TO THE CASE

{¶ 2} Gary Rose ("Gary"), Nancy Rose ("Nancy"), and Auto-Owners Insurance Company ("Auto-Owners") are the plaintiffs-appellants. Gary, Nancy, and Auto-Owners will be collectively referred to herein as the plaintiffs.

{¶ 3} Jessica Phinney ("Jessica"), Andrew Cross, ("Andrew"), and Hastings Mutual Insurance Company ("Hastings Mutual") are the defendants-appellees.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

{…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lorain National Bank v. Saratoga ApartmentsOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Copeland Corp., L.L.C. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API