Legal Opinion

Feigenbaum v. Van Raalte

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 10, 1947No. 39926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HYDE, J.. This is an action on an account, tried without á jury. Plaintiff had judgment for $117,855.43. (Balance due $105,166.33; interest $12,689.10) On motion for new trial a remittitur of $25,856.66 was ordered and made. Defendant has appealed from the final judgment entered.

Plaintiff has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Defendant’s brief does not fully comply with our rules (the statement of facts is neither properly made nor in the proper place) and his transcript does not correctly show the final amended judgment entered after remittitur. Because we find merit in defendant’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ring v. JamisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  2. Arthur & Co. v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Scheer v. Trust Co. of St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. Chadwick v. ChadwickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Townsend v. SchadenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Handlan v. HandlanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Ellis v. FarmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Gothard v. SpradlingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Gothard v. SpradlingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API