Legal Opinion
Smith v. Middletown Township of Pennsylvania
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 14, 2025No. 2:23-cv-02412Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CURTIS SMITH : : Plaintiff : v. : CIVIL ACTION : : MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP OF : NO. 23-2412 PENNSYLVANIA, et al. : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM Perez, J. May 14, 2025 Pro se Plaintiff Curtis Smith brings claims against Defendants Middletown Township of Pennsylvania (“Township”), Jim Ennis, and Stephanie Teoli Kuhls for constitutional violations, fraud, theft, racketeering, and terrorism, arising out of their enforcement of a municipal permitting ordinance. Presently before the Court is Defendants’ supplemental motion for…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.