Strout v. Natoma Water & Minning Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, County of El Dorado. The facts of this case are fully stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The facts necessary to explain the decision of this case, were substantially these:
1. On the fifteenth day of October, 1853, John R. Prindle executed a note to Adams & Co., for one thousand five hundred dollars, and pledged to them, as collateral security, two shares of the stock of said company, of about the value of one thousand eight hundred dollars. There was, however, no transfer of the stock upon the books of the company.
2. On the thirty-first day of January, 1854, Bruce Herrick sued Prindle, and attached the stock. Judgment was recovered for four hundred and twenty dollars and costs;…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- In re the Election of Directors of the Argus Printing Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- Nat. Bank Etc. v. Western Pac. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Wright v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.