Legal Opinion

Oakes v. St. Louis Candy Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 6, 1898PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Jacob Klein, Judge. (1) The finding and judgment of the court should have been for the plaintiff. An injunction should have been granted. Sanders v. Jacob, 20 Mo. App. 96; St. Louis Garb. Mfg. Go. v. Fclipse Carb. Go., 58 Mo. App. 411; Am. Brew. Go. v. St. Louis Breiv. Co., 47 Mo. App. 14; Trash ‘v. Wooster, 28 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Jacob Klein, Judge. (1) The finding and judgment of the court should have been for the plaintiff. An injunction should have been granted. Sanders v. Jacob, 20 Mo. App. 96; St. Louis Garb. Mfg. Go. v. Fclipse Carb. Go., 58 Mo. App. 411; Am. Brew. Go. v. St. Louis Breiv. Co., 47 Mo. App. 14; Trash ‘v. Wooster, 28 Mo. App. 408; Filley v. Fassett, 44 Mo. 168; Liggett-Meyers TobaccoCo. v. Sam Reed Tobacco Co., 104Mo. 153; Carson v. Cry, 39 Fed. Rep. 777; Weener v. Brayton, 152 Mass. 101; Union v. Conbain, 51 Minn. 243. (2) The use of the collection…

1Opinion of the CourtG-antt, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis. ■

The action was one first to restrain defendants from selling or offering for sale or advertising a confection or candy in the similitude, likeness, or bearing a resemblance to a confection manufactured and sold by plaintiff under the name of “What Is It!” Second, for $10,000 damages for the alleged piracy of said name by defendants.

The circuit court found the issues for defendants on both counts and dismissed the petition. Plaintiff appeals.

The following finding of the facts by his honor, Judge Jacob Klein, is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Tennessee Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Candee, Swan & Co. v. Deere & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. Sam. Reid Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  5. State v. BishopSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Superior Gearbox Co. v. EdwardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Drive It Yourself Co. v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Mistolín de Puerto Rico, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986
  4. Western Stove Co. v. Geo. D. Roper CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
  5. Coca-Cola Co. v. StevensonDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API