Legal Opinion

Flores v. Haberman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1996No. 95-0597PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Per curiam

This mandamus concerns the propriety of notices to file lis pendens. Because the interest asserted by the real parties in interest is not one articulated in Texas Property Code § 12.007(a), we conditionally grant the writ of mandamus and direct the trial court to cancel the notices of lis pendens.

Plaintiffs brought a suit for conversion against Flores. They alleged that he converted property and used the proceeds to buy certain other properties. In their petition, they sought the imposition of a constructive trust on the property. They filed notices of lis pendens on the purchased properties,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moss v. TennantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. JarvisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Howard, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  3. In Re Cohen, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  4. Garza v. Pope, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  5. In Re Jamail, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API