Legal Opinion

Hampshire v. Ford Motor Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1986No. Docket 82061PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff filed a products liability action against defendant and now appeals as of right from a grant of summary judgment in defendant’s favor. The circuit court ruled that, under California law, defendant did not owe a duty to plaintiff under the facts of this case. We affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment.

The facts, as alleged by plaintiff, which gave rise to this appeal are relatively simple. On December 17, 1976, plaintiff was driving his 1966 Cadillac on Franklin Avenue in the County of Los Angeles, California. Plaintiff sustained serious injuries when his vehicle was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Elmore v. American Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Antcliff v. State Employees Credit UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Sexton v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. MacCabees Mutual Life Insurance v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Sutherland v. Kennington Truck Service, LtdMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. The Standard Fire Insurance Co v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. Christine Mahne v. Ford Motor Company Donald Petersen and Harold MacDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Hall v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API