Ealy v. State

| Appellant Jaylan Ealy challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction for committing a terroristic act. Appellant argues that his conduct did not meet the statutory definition of a terroristic act. We affirm.

Appellant was charged with aggravated robbery, first-degree battery, aggravated assault, and committing a terroristic act following a shooting outside a party in North Little Rock. Testimony at trial established that Jerod Crutchfield attended the party with three other teenagers. When the four were leaving the party, they walked past appellant, who asked…