Legal Opinion

State v. Fidler

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 23, 1972No. 7219SC75PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

By his first assignment of error defendant contends that the trial court’s refusal to continue the case was a denial of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. We do not agree with this contention. A motion for continuance is ordinarily addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and therefore is generally not subject to judicial review absent a showing of gross abuse of discretion. State v. Hewett, 270 N.C. 348, 154 S.E. 2d 476 (1967) ; State v. Ferebee, 266 N.C. 606, 146 S.E. 2d 666 (1966). The trial court in exercising its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. FerebeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API