Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1981No. 80-1803PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue presented in this cause is whether the patterns in question are exempt from taxation by virtue of the provisions of R. C. 5701.03.3 In pertinent part, R. C. 5701.03 states: “As used in Title LVII of the Revised Code, ‘personal property’ includes every tangible thing which is the subject of ownership, whether animate or inanimate, other than patterns, jigs, dies, or drawings, which are held for use and not for sale in the ordinary course of business* * *and not forming part of a parcel of real property* * *. The exclusion of patterns, jigs, dies, and drawings from the definition…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Celina Mutual Ins. v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Federal Paper Board Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Howell Air, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Louisville Title Agency for N. W. Ohio, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Babcock & Wilcox. Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. United Transportation Union Insurance v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Philips Industries, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. United Transp. Union Ins. Assn. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API