Legal Opinion
Sun Ray Gas Corp. v. Bellows-Claude Neon Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 12, 1931No. 5644Published
1Opinion of the Court
49 F.2d 886 (1931)
SUN RAY GAS CORPORATION et al.
v.
BELLOWS-CLAUDE NEON CO. et al.
No. 5644.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 12, 1931.
Kwis, Hudson & Kent, Lloyd L. Evans, and A. J. Hudson, all of Cleveland, Ohio, and George F. Scull, of New York City, for appellants.
Harold Elno Smith, of Cleveland, Ohio, and William Bohleber, of New York City (Smith & Freeman, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Francis H. Fassett, of Dayton, Ohio, on the brief), for appellees.
Before DENISON, HICKS, and HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judges.
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
Appellants urge the invalidity of claim 1 of patent…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.