Legal Opinion
Trupiano v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 23, 1995No. 30A01-9411-CV-372PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellants-plaintiffs Jerome and Jenny Trupiano appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees-de-fendants John J. Alkema, Syrett-Zeerip-Weidenfeller, Inc. (SZW), and Cincinnati Insurance (Cincinnati) on their claim of negli-genee. Specifically, the Trupianos allege that Alkema and SZW owed them a duty to advise them about underinsured motorist coverage and to provide an insurance policy with adequate limits for that coverage.
FACTS
SZW is an insurance agency, located in Michigan, which primarily sells casualty insurance. Alkema is an insurance…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Stein v. Continental Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Palmer v. Pacific Indemnity Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Bruner v. League General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Perez v. KFC National Management Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Murphy v. KuhnNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Sadler v. Loomis Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Scotto Princeton LLC v. Felsen Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2005
- Trupiano v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995