One-Two-Three Co. v. Tavern Fruit Juice Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
INCH, District Judge.
This is a motion to hold the above named defendant in civil contempt and impose such punishment as may be just. The contempt relates to an alleged failure by the defendant to obey a consent decree in a patent, trade-mark, and copy-right, suit.
The motion first came on to be heard before Judge Abruzzo, who duly referred same to me because I had signed the consent decree. Counsel for each of the parties have orally argued their respective claims and submitted briefs.
The real issue is narrow but in order to understand the circumstances a brief reference to the consent decree…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. MolitorSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Terminal Railroad Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- SALVAGE PROCESS CORPORATION v. Acme Tank Cleaning Process CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Nachman Spring-Filled Corporation v. Kay Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- California Fruit Growers Exchange v. Sunkist Drinks, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.