Legal Opinion
SALVAGE PROCESS CORPORATION v. Acme Tank Cleaning Process Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 7, 1936No. 198PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Per curiam
This case is a companion to Salvage Process Corporation et al. v. Acme Tank Cleaning Process Corporation (C.C.A.) 86 F.(2d) 725, handed down herewith. The appeal is from an order fining the defendant for the plaintiffs’ expenses in prosecuting a contempt of the temporary injunction there considered. After that decree had passed, the defendant made some slight changes in its method and apparatus which it thought would avoid infringement, but which we need not consider. It is indeed abundantly well settled that a defendant may not dispute the validity of an injunction upon a motion to punish…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Worden v. SearlsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- McCann v. New York Stock ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Brougham v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
- Pelzer, Rodgers & Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
- In re FanningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Dennis Garberg & Associates, Inc. v. Pack-Tech International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Latrobe Steel Co. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. Larry Salkeld Appeal of Donald E. PinchockCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Spectro Foods Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.