Legal Opinion
California Fruit Growers Exchange v. Sunkist Drinks, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 12, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The application is one by the plaintiff to have the defendant held in contempt for violation of the injunction granted in this case, and also to have an order modifying the injunction vacated.
In 1931 the plaintiff, a California corporation engaged in marketing oranges and other citrus fruits, brought suit in equity in this court against the defendant, a New York corporation engaged in selling bottled carbonated beverages. The suit was based on alleged infringement of the plaintiff’s trademark Sunkist and also on unfair competition, and an injunction was asked for.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- California Fruit Growers Exchange v. Sunkist Drinks, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1933
3Cited by7 opinions
- Institute of Cetacean Research v. Sea Shepherd Conservation SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- John B. Stetson Co. v. Stephen L. Stetson Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Folk v. Standard Business Forms, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1967
- Institute of Cetacean v. Sea ShepardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. McCroryDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.