Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. City of St. Petersburg
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided August 1, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
—Writ of error brings for review judgment quashing alternative writ of mandamus.
The command of the alternative writ was:
“Now, Therefore, we being willing that full and speedy justice be done in the premises, do command you, the City of St. Petersburg, a municipal corporation, and you, J. W. Wahlman, as Building Inspector of the said City of St. Petersburg, Florida, and each of you, forthwith to issue to the said Alma G. Reynolds and Ira A. Reynolds a permit to erect said buildings in accordance with said plans and specifications upon the filing with you, J. W. Wahlman, as Building Inspector,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Highland Farms Dairy, Inc. v. AgnewSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- BORDEN’S FARM PRODUCTS CO., INC. v. TEN EYCK, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE & MARKETS OF NEW YORK, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Miami Home Milk Producers Asso. v. Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nelsen v. TilleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Miami Beach v. the Texas Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
- F. S. Bowen Electric Co. v. FoleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Remick v. ClousingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Howard v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.