Legal Opinion
Baldwin v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 2, 1962No. 2971, 2972PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge.
Appellant was charged in two informa-tions with the practice of podiatry without a license. 1 The informations were based on two instances of treatment, occurring about a month apart: the first of a woman who came toi appellant for treatment of a corn, and the second of an investigator from the Woman’s Bureau of the Metropolitan Police Department. Appellant was found guilty on both informations, and given a sentence of $500 or 180 days on each, the sentences to run consecutively. On this appeal there is no challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Collins v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Simon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Robert Roberts, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Samuel Kowalsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- State v. LydonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Azbill v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- District of Columbia v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Abdulshakur v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Dunham v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. HornCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966