Legal Opinion
Gonzales v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 19, 2013No. 11-1511UnpublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT **
HARRIS L. HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
James Gonzales applied for disability and supplemental security income benefits, claiming he was disabled by a number of physical and mental conditions. An administrative law judge (ALJ) held a hearing and issued an unfavorable decision. The Appeals Council and district court upheld the ALJ’s decision, and Gonzales now appeals. Exercising jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
I. Background
Gonzales filed his first application for disability-insurance benefits and supplemental security income in 1999. An ALJ…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wall v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Watkins v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Krauser v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Grace DRUMMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Poppa v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Engberg v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023
- Fisher v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022
- Gott v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Holtsclaw v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- Hunt v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.