Legal Opinion
People v. Gatling
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Charles J. Tejada, J.
The defendant, Vincent Gatling, filed a motion to dismiss *887this indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 alleging that he has been denied his right to a speedy trial. The defendant contends that 189 days of excludable time have elapsed within which the People were not ready for trial. The People countered that only 106 days chargeable to them have elapsed.
The relevant period to be considered in determining this motion is from February 10, 1993, when the mistrial was declared, to September 21, 1993, when the instant motion was filed.
CALCULATION OF CHARGEABLE TIME
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. KendziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. CortesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. HamiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. LiottaNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. DanielsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. AlfonsoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1997