Legal Opinion

Stonehill v. National Archives and Records Administration

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 25, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2022-3391Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAULINE DALE STONEHILL, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-3391 (CJN) NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court in this FOIA action are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and a motion to substitute a new party in place of the now-deceased plaintiff, Pauline Dale Stonehill. ECF No. 21 (Def’s Mot.); ECF No. 26-1 (Stonehill Mot.); ECF No. 33 (Substitution Mot.). For the reasons explained below, the Court will grant summary judgment in favor of the defendant, the National…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  4. United States Department of Justice v. Tax AnalystsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Trans-Pacific Policing Agreement v. United States Customs ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API