Legal Opinion
Asklar v. Honeywell, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 30, 1982No. Civ. No. H-78-353PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS OF HELEN ASK-LAR FOR SUBSTITUTION, FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT, AND FOR PERMISSION TO INTERVENE
CLARIE, Chief Judge.
This action was brought originally by Joseph J. Asklar, a former employee of the defendant Honeywell, Inc., under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634. While the action was pending, Asklar died. Helen Asklar, the deceased’s widow, subsequently obtained formal appointment as Executrix of her husband’s estate and now presents three motions to the Court: (1) a motion for substitution, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(a); (2) a motion for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Robertson v. WegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rodriguez v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Fariss v. Lynchburg FoundryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Dr. Milton Margoles v. Alida Johns and the Journal Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Henry H. HALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John O. MARSH, as Secretary of the Army, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Murphy v. Cadillac Rubber & Plastics, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1996
- Gasior v. Massachusetts General HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.