Legal Opinion

State v. Wills

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Newton Circuit Court. — Eon. F. C. Johnston, Judge. (T) Tbe information is defective because it fails to give the names of the persons to whom the alleged sales were made, and the court erred in not quashing it. State v. Martin, 108 Mo.. 117. (2) The court committed prejudicial error in permitting Clanton and Bales to testify regarding the empty Peruvian bottles' behind the chili stand and behind Tom White’s building. State v. Seigenthaler, 121 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Newton Circuit Court. — Eon. F. C. Johnston, Judge. (T) Tbe information is defective because it fails to give the names of the persons to whom the alleged sales were made, and the court erred in not quashing it. State v. Martin, 108 Mo.. 117. (2) The court committed prejudicial error in permitting Clanton and Bales to testify regarding the empty Peruvian bottles' behind the chili stand and behind Tom White’s building. State v. Seigenthaler, 121 Mo. App. 510; State v. Pier-line, 19 Mo.' 380; State v. Roberts, 33 Mo. App. 524;. Driver v. State, 85 S. W. 1056; Parish v, State, 89 S.…

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

Prosecution for sale of liquor in violation of the Local Option Law within the city of Neosho. Defendants were convicted upon the first count in the information and have appealed.

The information contains eight counts all of which are in the same form, and the sufficiency of the information is assailed upon the ground that the names of the parties to whom the liquor is charged to have been sold are not given. It is conceded that ordinarily it is *609not necessary in charging a violation of the Dramshop Law or Local Option Law to give the name of the party to whom it is claimed the liqnor was sold,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. PiperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. State v. Certain Intoxicating LiquorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. State v. QuinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. State v. QuinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  5. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jacob Ruppert v. CaffeySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. State v. GallitonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. State v. ZehnderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Sincup v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. Sincup v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API