State v. Zehnder
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Phelps Circuit Court. — Hon. L. B. Woodside, Judge. (1) The inf ormation in this case was not verified as required by law, and the attention of the court was called thereto by a timely motion to quash, which motion was overruled and exceptions saved. The case should be reversed.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Phelps Circuit Court. — Hon. L. B. Woodside, Judge. (1) The inf ormation in this case was not verified as required by law, and the attention of the court was called thereto by a timely motion to quash, which motion was overruled and exceptions saved. The case should be reversed. Sec, 5057, R. S, 1909'; State v. Bonner, 178 Mo. 1. c. 431; State v. Hicks, 178 Mo. 1. c. 445; State v. Branch, 178 Mo. 1. c. 412; State v. Schnettler, 181 Mo. 1. c. 185; State v. Brown, 181 Mo. 1. c. 233; State v. McGee, 181 Mo. 1. c. 315; State v. Hanigan, 182 Mo. 15; State v. Decker, 182 Mo. 1. c. 184;…
1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.
The defendants were convicted of violating the Local Option Law theretofore adopted in Phelps county, Missouri, in selling intoxicating liquors in Rolla at a place called the Germania Yerein, and have appealed.
The information was attacked by a motion to quash same, which was overruled, exceptions saved and error is assigned thereon hére. The objections made to the information is that it was not filed on the official oath of the prosecuting attorney, or on the official oath of any other officer or body authorized to file the same, and was not verified as required by law. The information is…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. SearcyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- State v. BonnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- State v. DuganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- State v. HallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
- State v. PratherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ElmoreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916