Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sincup v. Blackwell

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 12, 1980No. 61861Published

1DissentSeiler, Judge

I respectfully dissent. For reasons stated below, our system of probation does not intend or permit the indiscriminate revocation of probation and automatic commitment to imprisonment as was done here.

I

The trial court found that defendant did on October 7,1979 drink intoxicating beverages, to wit, Busch beer, and that this constituted violation of a special condition of his probation, for which probation was revoked.

The single bit of evidence on which this finding rests is that a deputy sheriff saw defendant drink from a can labelled Busch beer.

I doubt if this is sufficient. There is no…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Mario S. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  3. Abel v. WyrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. State v. LetourneauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API