Sincup v. Blackwell
Supreme Court of Missouri
1DissentSeiler, Judge
I respectfully dissent. For reasons stated below, our system of probation does not intend or permit the indiscriminate revocation of probation and automatic commitment to imprisonment as was done here.
I
The trial court found that defendant did on October 7,1979 drink intoxicating beverages, to wit, Busch beer, and that this constituted violation of a special condition of his probation, for which probation was revoked.
The single bit of evidence on which this finding rests is that a deputy sheriff saw defendant drink from a can labelled Busch beer.
I doubt if this is sufficient. There is no…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Mario S. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Abel v. WyrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- State v. LetourneauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.