Markel v. Florida State Board of Architecture
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SWANN, Judge.
After a hearing the Florida State Board of Architecture revoked the license of Charles H. Markel to practice architecture in Florida. He filed a petition for writ of certiorari and we have considered the respective contentions, briefs and arguments.
Petitioner argues five separate points. We hold that Points Two, Three and Four do not contain sufficient merit to warrant quashal of the order herein challenged. The essence of his argument is that § 467.14 and § 467.15, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. are so vague and indefinite that they are unconstitutional.
Generally, they prohibit an architect…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Omaechevarria v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Hygrade Provision Co., Inc. v. Sherman, Atty. Gen. Of New York Lewis & Fox Co. v. Same. Satz v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brock v. HardieSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Lambdin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
3Cited by3 opinions
- Markel v. Florida State Board of ArchitectureSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Markel v. Florida State Board of ArchitectureDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Rohwer v. Florida State Board of ArchitectureDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975