Davis v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant American Family Mutual Insurance Company challenges the trial court’s finding that it is liable for the full amount of underinsured motorist coverage available under the automobile policy of respondent John A. Davis’s father. Respondent filed a notice of review, claiming that the trial court should have applied Wisconsin law, thus permitting stacking of respondent’s two automobile policies. Because we conclude that Minn.Stat. § 65B.49, subd. 4a applies where an injured passenger has not collected underinsured motorist benefits first from the car owner or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Meyer v. Illinois Farmers Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Thommen v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Great West Casualty Co. v. HovaldtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Schons v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Norton v. Tri-State Insurance Co. of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Schons v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Johnson v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.