Legal Opinion
Yates v. Applied Performance Technologies, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 26, 2002No. Nos. C2-01-765, C2-01-999PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
MARBLEY, District Judge.
In three related lawsuits, Plaintiffs have filed actions seeking to recover overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and Ohio Revised Code § 4111.01 et seq. Those three lawsuits may be summarized as follows:(1) Yates v. Applied Performance Technologies, Inc., Case No. C2-01-765 (hereinafter “Yates”): A group of seven plaintiffs, all former computer consultants for Applied Performance Technologies, Inc. (“APT”), filed suit on behalf of themselves and a class of others similarly situated, seeking to recover overtime pay to which they…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Elliott Travel & Tours, Inc. And Jared SchubinerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Caruso v. WixomCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Litster Frost v. Idaho Injury Law GroupIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
- Amatech Group Limited v. Federal Card Services, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- Bryenton v. PreyerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
- CLAIBORNE v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.