Legal Opinion

Kerns v. Couch

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

The first assignment of error is based upon the action of the trial court in overruling defendant’s objection to the introduction of any testimony by plaintiff. The question thus presented is whether this action can be maintained against the county. It is a well-recognized principle that in the absence of a statute, either expressly or impliedly authorizing it, an action based upon tort cannot be prosecuted against a county.

It is a well-recognized rule in this state that a plaintiff may waive a tort and declare upon an implied contract. Moreover, the rule has been announced by this court that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gearin v. Marion CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Theiler v. Tillamook CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. O. R. & N. Co. v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Kerns v. Union CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Baden v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Beck v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Shephard v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State v. LibbeyOregon Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API