Chicago Flexotile Floor Co. v. Lane

OLSEN, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial and also from the judgment entered in plaintiff’s favor.

The case Avas tried to the court, and findings of fact and conclusions of law were duly made, upon which judgment was entered. The plaintiff was and is engaged in the business of furnishing the material for and laying what is known as “Flexotile Floors” or floor coverings in buildings. It enters into contracts with owners or occupants of buildings to install such floors at a fixed price per square foot. This floor material was manufactured, or at least its…