Legal Opinion
Safrin v. Joe Friedman Hat Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 27, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.
Plaintiff moves to substitute as defendant “ Joe Friedman Hat Co., a partnership, in the place and stead of defendant J oe Friedman Hat Co., Inc., with the same force and effect as if said Joe Friedman Hat Co. had been originally named and served with the summons and complaint in this action, and amending the caption ” to show Joe Friedman Hat Co. as defendant. This action was started June 25, 1948. An attorney for a trade association moved to have the controversy submitted to arbitration. The motion was denied. Then the defendant, through its own attorney, ’ answered and denied the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- New York State Monitor Milk Pan Ass'n v. Remington Agricultural WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Ward v. Terry & Tench Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Princeton Textile Printing Corp. v. Walter Peek Paper Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1949
- Kelly v. Carson Petroleum Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1924
3Cited by2 opinions
- Safrin v. FriedmanNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- Adams v. HirschNew York Supreme Court · 1961