Legal Opinion
Adams v. Hirsch
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel Rabbst, J.
The defendants “ appearing specially, for the purposes of this motion only” move, pursuant to section 237-a of the Civil Practice Act, for an order dismissing the proceedings 1 ‘ on the ground that service of process was never made on any defendant herein, and this Court, in consequence, lacks jurisdiction over the person of any and all of the * * * defendants herein.”
This is an action to recover for property damage allegedly sustained on January 18, 1954, when plaintiffs were tenants of lofts in certain premises located in Queens County. They claim that through the negligence of the owner,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bannon v. BannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Rager v. McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Edward Hansen, Inc. v. Kearny Post Office Assocs.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979