Legal Opinion

Strom v. Lipschultz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 1, 1972No. 71-154PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. JUSTICE THOMAS J. MORAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, a general contractor, brought an action for extra work performed and for construction of a pool and cabana which were not included in the contract price of the home built for defendants. Defendants appeal from a jury verdict of $12,000 in favor of plaintiff.

On appeal, defendants contend that: 1) plaintiff cannot recover for orally requested extras because a) — contractual provision limits recovery to items for which written change orders were provided, and b) — such recovery is barred by the statute of limitations for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lau v. West Towns Bus Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Watson Lumber Co. v. GuennewigAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  3. City of Elgin v. JoslynIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Concord Apartment House Co. v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Norkevich v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kingston v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Mayer Paving & Asphalt Co. v. Carl A. Morse, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. De Rosa v. Albert F. Amling Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Blinderman Construction Co. v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API