Legal Opinion

Hardware Mutual Insurance Company v. Robert M. Lukken, D/B/A Lukken Steel Construction Company, and Roy Tibbs

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 12, 1967No. 8538_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

Appellant Hardware Mutual Insurance Company issued a fire insurance policy on a building located in Tulsa, Oklahoma. A fire occurred, and Hardware as sub-rogee sued appellees Tibbs and Lukken on the theory that their negligence was the proximate cause of the fire. A jury found for the appellees, and Hardware appeals.

Hardware first complains of the court’s refusal to direct a verdict or grant judgment n. o. v. in its favor. This means, of course, that Hardware has the heavy burden of convincing us that actionable negligence is the only permissible inference which can be…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Dellwo v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Hugh Breeding, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  4. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Dunn v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Robert Fred Swearngin v. Sears Roebuck & Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  2. Narkin v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  3. Vincent Chiodo v. General Waterworks Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  4. Kathleen K. Wilkin v. Sunbeam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  5. Galbreath v. City of LogansportIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API